From September 2020, the new Welfare Officer is Major Robert Denman and is contactable directly by eMail: email@example.com
Welfare Notes – 2020.
As I write, on the last day of the quarter at the end of March, the London stock market has fallen by a little over 25% since the start of the year. We are all poorer than we were not only through the reduced value of shares, or pensions, or employment prospects but through the huge debt the Government has had to incur to protect the population and businesses from the corona-virus worldwide shock to all economies.
And you may ask where does this leave the Benevolent Fund and the Regimental Association’s attitude to welfare?
Ten years ago, Geoff Jenkins passed the job of Welfare Officer to me when the assets of the Fund totalled about £350,000. By the end of 2019, the Fund value had increased to £619,000 (note that inflation over the decade needs to be taken into account to make a full assessment of its appreciation) with the increase due to modest claims and associated distributions as well as sound management with the investment decisions largely resting with our professional adviser. But today the shares portfolio has, on paper, suffered a reduced value, but in spite of this fall, be assured that the Fund is well able to meet all expected and valid claims.
In summary, support may be available to serving and former members of the Regiment and their dependents. Grants are not made to settle debts and, while not all claims are accepted, a fairly generous approach is adopted in most cases. Those who are eligible and finding themselves in need of support or are now in straitened financial circumstances due to the present pandemic should consider an application. All claims are dealt with promptly and confidentially.
Write giving an outline of the application and full contact details to the Welfare Officer, LIR Regimental Association at Connaught House.
Dick Scott Kerr, Welfare Officer.
Are the UK’s soldiers and their families being properly looked after and who should be doing it?
It is the Government’s responsibility and they must act on behalf of all of us which, if it means finding more money to equip our armed forces adequately and provide appropriate housing for those who serve and their dependents, then that must be found from within the budget or by higher taxation. The obligation of the Government and the nation in this regard is stated in the Military Covenant.
Attention to the concept of the Military Covenant has been markedly increasing over the last twenty years. In 2000 Maj. Gen. Sir Sebastian Roberts wrote “Soldiering” in which he set out the non-contractual but vital deal under which the military function. To quote briefly “Soldiers will be called upon to make personal sacrifices – including the ultimate sacrifice – in the service of the Nation. In putting the needs of the Nation and the Army before their own, they forgo some of the rights enjoyed by those outside the Armed Forces.
In return, British soldiers must always be able to expect fair treatment, to be valued and respected as individuals, and that they (and their families) will be sustained and rewarded by commensurate terms and conditions of service.”
Pressures on service personnel with campaigns in both Iraq and Afghanistan caused all parties to the Military Covenant to question whether it was being honoured. By 2007 with a huge rise in public support for the military (“Help for Heroes” and the Royal British Legion’s campaign “Honour the Covenant” launched that year) the Military Covenant was moving from being primarily part of the Army’s ethos to a concept with which the UK Government and population were increasingly aware. By 2011, under the Coalition Government, the trust based Military Covenant, evolved over centuries, became the Armed Forces Covenant as part of the Armed Forces Act.
Newspaper reports of shoddy housing and poor maintenance endured by service families and endless press coverage of cut-backs to equipment supply suggests that the Armed Forces Covenant is not being given due attention. The Army is built on a philosophy of mutual support whether it is giving first aid to the man beside you, covering fire from one section for another or help within the regimental family. While one might question the Government’s commitment to the Armed Forces Covenant, at least within the LIR family we can have confidence in mutual support.
For those who need financial help, the Benevolent Fund of the Regimental Association stands ready.
WHAT DOES ‘Welfare’ mean to us?
The Oxford English Dictionary offers: “the health, happiness, and fortunes of a person or group” and “organised practical or financial help provided, typically by the state, to help people in need”. In the immediate and practical sense perhaps it means looking out for our friends and neighbours, since each of us should be active in ensuring the welfare of those around us. Alarmingly, recent research shows that in the UK only one in three of us knows the surname and work situation of our immediate neighbours and I’m sure an even lower proportion stands ready to lend a helping hand.
Few of us make sufficient effort to be supportive of those in need. Certainly in my case there have been long periods when paddling my own canoe has been the main concern. Recently, I have had the opportunity to make visits to two elderly people both in their mid-nineties resident in nursing homes and receiving palliative care. One is a London Irishman who served with the regiment throughout the Second World War and the other a lady who also served in uniform during that conflict. They are members of a dwindling generation who knew all about looking after others.
Those of us who follow must take up the banner. Members of the London Irish Rifles have a special extra duty in this regard. We must give support to other regimental family members as and when it is needed: it is a regimental tradition. In addition, we are fortunate, should it be necessary, to be able to call for financial assistance from the Regimental Association Benevolent Fund.